Smoking and Your Health

Is somking really bad for you? According to a decades worth of debate, legal battles and multitudes of opinions the verdit has been made – or so it seems. The 1998 Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement had set a precedent. It was the larget legal settlement in history involving 46 states and the four largest US manufacturers of tabacco products. Among other things, this settlement determined that not only was tobacco use addictive but that its major manufacturers had long known this fact and attempted to conceal their findings while leveraging this knowledge to further market and distrbute their wares.

Was the American public, of the world at large, truly so naive to have been surprised by the fact that somke inhalation must have certain negative effects on the body? More so, was it any more of a revelation that the effects of nicotine – tobacco’s “secretly” addictive ingredient – which results in certain relaxing and calming effects on the body, may be habit forming or addictive? Nicotine works in such a way that it floods the brain with dopamine, thereby the impetus behind tobacco use and its popularity. It seems that a quick survey of Native Americans, who first introduced tobacco to European settlers, would have revealed tobacco’s capacity
as less of a “fun” past time and more as an entheogen used primarily for shamanic or spiritual purposes.

North American Indians used tobacco not as a recreational substance but rather as one set aside for specif purposes, whether spiritual or medicinal. Cigarettes were only introduced post-European introduction to this cash crop – and the rest, it seems, is histroy. Today, modern society is flooded with cigarettes, and its use shows little signs of abating since the landmark legal settlement of 1998. While, yes, tobacco users have certainly declined in number and there is no debate as to its ill effects on your health, still millions nationwide are either sporadic or habitual smokers.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Knee Injury

Left knee-joint from behind, showing interior ...
Image via Wikipedia

Possibly one of the most common injury among athletes is the knee injury. The knee joint is a part of the body exposed to some of the highest degrees of stress, from sport dependent to posture. Few serious athletes manage to escape a visit to the doctors office when it comes to this specific joint.

One example of a common knee injury amongst even the most casual weekend warriors is the torn meniscus. The menisci consist of two separate pieces of cartilage that rest between the femur and tibia, or shin bone. The meniscus that lies on the inside of the knee joint is the medial meniscus. The one that lies on the outside of the knee joint is the lateral meniscus.

As movement in the joint occurs, the menisci play a critical role by distributing the pressure between the joints evenly. Normal pressure and movement throughout a healthy joint result in comfortable and fluid operation. However, when excessive pressure or force is applied to the joint as the knee is turned and bent, the meniscus is most susceptible to a tear.

Meniscus tears are also common and often coincide with injuries or tears to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the medial collateral ligament (MCL). When these ligaments tear, the only solution is to reattach the ligament via arthroscopic surgery. However, when a meniscus tears, there are possible several solutions depending on the extent of the tear and the level of activity of the patient. The most common solution is the removal of the torn portion of the meniscus, also known as a menisectomy. Another alternative, though less common, is the repair of the mensicus, where the torn portion is reattached. This latter alternative is only effective if the tear is fairly recent and the torn piece remains sufficiently viable to reattach and heal properly.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Healthcare – Should the Government Play a Role?

Veterans Affairs Building, Miles City
Image by dave_mcmt via Flickr

Is government mandated healthcare dictating how much hospitals, doctors, nurses, clinics and every other facet of the healthcare industry can generate in terms of income? Is it socialist? Will the quality of healthcare drop as a result of government intervention? The answers to these questions depend on who you ask, and nowhere else on the planet have these issues been more hotly debated in 2010 than in the United States.

One might ask, how does the U.S. health care system rank in relation to other countries? Well, great question, but who do you ask? Who might be considered the most impartial judge, the least to gain from an answer in one direction or another? And, why would the United States public care to listen? The United Nations, an organization whose roots lie during World War II, was organized as an international forum for maintaining communications among the world of nations with the lofty purpose of achieving world peace and resolving global economic, social and humanitarian issues.

One particular agency of the UN is the World Health Organization (WHO), which, as the name implies, is charged with addressing all issues relevant with the current level of health of the world population. It researches, analyzes, consults, reviews and proposes norms and standards for all member nations to consider and undertake as far as their perceived needs and political climate will allow. The WHO is as close as the world has come to an international organization for the sharing and dissemination of ideas, processes, and research to do with health as it relates to the global and individual countries’ populations.

In June 21, 2000, the WHO published The World Health Report 2000, where it found that the United States spends a higher portion of its gross domestic product on health care than any other country yet ranked 37th in the world. France was found to rank number one with Italy second and San Marino third.

Enhanced by Zemanta